With the reform intended to address challenges related to demographic shifts and the sustainability of retirement funding, its rejection leaves the pension system in question.

The 2024 LPP Reform: Key Proposals

The LPP reform of 2024 was designed to address imbalances in Switzerland's second-pillar pension system. The key proposals included:

• A reduction in the minimum conversion rate (the percentage of pension capital that is paid out annually as a pension), to adapt to longer life expectancies.
• A boost in contributions for part-time workers and low-income earners, to ensure better pension coverage for those in more precarious employment situations.
• Compensatory measures to ensure that older workers (particularly those close to retirement age) would not experience a sharp reduction in their expected pension benefits.

These measures were proposed to ensure that the pension system remains solvent and can continue to provide an adequate retirement income for future generations. However, despite these intentions, the reform package was ultimately rejected at the ballot box.

Reasons for the Negative Vote Outcome

While the reform sought to tackle structural issues, several factors likely contributed to its rejection:

• Perceived fairness: Many voters may have viewed the reduction in the conversion rate as unfair. There is often strong resistance to changes that affect the timing and level of pension benefits, especially for those nearing retirement who are directly impacted.
• Fear of benefit cuts: Although the changes were framed as necessary to preserve the system, the fear of immediate benefit cuts likely outweighed the longer-term perspective of solvency and fairness.
• Trust in the pension system: Swiss voters traditionally place significant trust in the pension system, and any changes to it can trigger concerns about the security of their future. The complexity of the reform and the perceived lack of direct benefits for the majority of voters might have contributed to its defeat.

When the initial project first reached Bern, it appeared to be fairly balanced and to have reached a consensus between employer representatives and employee unions. However, many amendments negotiated during the process left neither side happy with the final text put to the vote. A somewhat messy campaign filled with complexity and misinformation did not help to convince voters.

This outcome underscores the difficulty of pushing through pension system reforms, which often require trade-offs that can be politically difficult and unpalatable, even when necessary.

Financing Retirement: A Snapshot of the Current System

Switzerland’s pension system is built on three pillars:

1. The first pillar (AHV/AVS): A pay-as-you-go state pension designed to cover basic living costs, funded through payroll contributions from employers and employees.
2. The second pillar (LPP): A mandatory occupational pension scheme, to which employers and employees contribute, building up savings that are converted into an annuity upon retirement.
3. The third pillar: A voluntary private savings scheme that offers tax advantages for those who contribute.

The second pillar, which was the focus of the reform, is meant to ensure that combined with the first pillar, retirees receive about 60% of their pre-retirement income. However, shifting demographics are undermining this objective.

The Structural Problems: Aging Population and Generational Imbalance

Switzerland’s pension system is increasingly strained by an aging population. Several structural factors contribute to this issue:

• Rising life expectancy: People are living longer, meaning pensions must be paid for more years than originally anticipated. This puts pressure on the system to provide enough resources for retirees without depleting funds.
• Falling birth rates: A shrinking working-age population is contributing to a generational imbalance. Fewer workers are supporting a growing number of retirees, leading to higher percapita costs for the younger generations still contributing to the system.
• Low interest rates: In the current economic environment, pension funds are struggling to achieve the investment returns needed to maintain their financial health. Low returns on savings mean that pensioners are at risk of receiving lower payouts than expected.

These structural problems pose a major challenge for Switzerland’s pension system. As the population ages and the ratio of workers to retirees continues to shrink, the financial sustainability of the LPP is increasingly jeopardized. Without reform, the system risks running deficits or being unable to provide sufficient pensions in the future.

Potential Solutions and Pathways for a Successful Reform

The failure of the 2024 LPP reform demonstrates the difficulty in achieving public consensus on pension changes, but it also highlights the need for an approach that balances both fairness and sustainability. Several strategies could be employed to help get a reform adopted and ensure the long-term viability of the pension system:

• Adjusting the Conversion Rate: Adjusting the LPP conversion rate to reflect increased life expectancy is crucial and almost unavoidable, but it needs to be implemented carefully. Protecting current retirees and older workers from changes while applying new rates only to younger generations might notreach universal acceptance. There is a fine line to be found to ensure intergenerational fairness. The recently proposed reform probably did not meet that goal.
• Targeted Communication and Transparency: One of the key lessons from the failed reform is the need for clear communication. Voters need to fully understand why reforms are necessary, and this can only be achieved through transparent, data-driven campaigns. Highlighting the long-term risks of inaction, such as reduced pensions or the need for more drastic cuts later, might help voters see the necessity of change.
• Strengthening the Third Pillar: Encouraging greater use of voluntary retirement savings in the third pillar could alleviate pressure on the mandatory pension schemes. Offering enhanced tax incentives or matching contribution programs could boost participation, especially among younger workers. However, this solution is often seen as favouring high-earners who have more financial flexibility. In any case, the mood seems to be moving in the opposite direction as it just came out that the federal council is rumoured to prepare tax increase for people willing to withdraw capital from the second or the third pillar.

The rejection of the LPP reform in September 2024 was a significant setback for efforts to stabilise Switzerland’s pension system. However, the demographic and economic challenges remain, making reform an inevitable necessity. The path forward will require a balanced approach—one that ensures the financial sustainability of the system while addressing the concerns of a diverse electorate. Successful reform will depend on transparent communication, gradual adjustments, and a focus on intergenerational fairness. Without such measures, the structural problems facing the pension system will only deepen, putting future pensioners at risk.

Would you like to optimise your retirement capital and prepare for your retirement with peace of mind? Contact us.